World Library  

Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

Uncertainty in the Determination of Soil Hydraulic Parameters and Its Influence on the Performance of Two Hydrological Models of Different Complexity : Volume 14, Issue 2 (09/02/2010)

By Baroni, G.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0003975027
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 20
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: Uncertainty in the Determination of Soil Hydraulic Parameters and Its Influence on the Performance of Two Hydrological Models of Different Complexity : Volume 14, Issue 2 (09/02/2010)  
Author: Baroni, G.
Volume: Vol. 14, Issue 2
Language: English
Subject: Science, Hydrology, Earth
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection, Copernicus GmbH
Publication Date:
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications


APA MLA Chicago

Facchi, A., Ortuani, B., Gandolfi, C., Van Dam, J. C., Horeschi, D., & Baroni, G. (2010). Uncertainty in the Determination of Soil Hydraulic Parameters and Its Influence on the Performance of Two Hydrological Models of Different Complexity : Volume 14, Issue 2 (09/02/2010). Retrieved from

Description: Dipartimento di Ingegneria Agraria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy. Data of soil hydraulic properties forms often a limiting factor in unsaturated zone modelling, especially at the larger scales. Investigations for the hydraulic characterization of soils are time-consuming and costly, and the accuracy of the results obtained by the different methodologies is still debated. However, we may wonder how the uncertainty in soil hydraulic parameters relates to the uncertainty of the selected modelling approach. We performed an intensive monitoring study during the cropping season of a 10 ha maize field in Northern Italy. The data were used to: i) compare different methods for determining soil hydraulic parameters and ii) evaluate the effect of the uncertainty in these parameters on different variables (i.e. evapotranspiration, average water content in the root zone, flux at the bottom boundary of the root zone) simulated by two hydrological models of different complexity: SWAP, a widely used model of soil moisture dynamics in unsaturated soils based on Richards equation, and ALHyMUS, a conceptual model of the same dynamics based on a reservoir cascade scheme. We employed five direct and indirect methods to determine soil hydraulic parameters for each horizon of the experimental profile. Two methods were based on a parameter optimization of: a) laboratory measured retention and hydraulic conductivity data and b) field measured retention and hydraulic conductivity data. The remaining three methods were based on the application of widely used Pedo-Transfer Functions: c) Rawls and Brakensiek, d) HYPRES, and e) ROSETTA. Simulations were performed using meteorological, irrigation and crop data measured at the experimental site during the period June – October 2006. Results showed a wide range of soil hydraulic parameter values generated with the different methods, especially for the saturated hydraulic conductivity Ksat and the shape parameter Α of the van Genuchten curve. This is reflected in a variability of the modeling results which is, as expected, different for each model and each variable analysed. The variability of the simulated water content in the root zone and of the bottom flux for different soil hydraulic parameter sets is found to be often larger than the difference between modeling results of the two models using the same soil hydraulic parameter set. Also we found that a good agreement in simulated soil moisture patterns may occur even if evapotranspiration and percolation fluxes are significantly different. Therefore multiple output variables should be considered to test the performances of methods and models.

Uncertainty in the determination of soil hydraulic parameters and its influence on the performance of two hydrological models of different complexity

Bastet, G., Bruand, A., Voltz, M., Bornand, M., and Quétin, P.: Performance of available pedotransfer functions for predicting the water retention properties of French soils, in: Characterization and Measurement of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Porous Media, edited by: van Genuchten, M. T., Leij, F. J., and Wu, L., University of California, Riverside, USA, 981–991, 1999.; Bouma, J.: Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Adv. Soil Sci., 9, 177–213, 1989.; Bouma, J. and van Lanen, J. A. J.: Transfer functions and threshold values; from soil characteristics to land qualities, in: Quantified Land Evaluation, edited by: Beek, K. J., Burrough, P. A., and McCormack, D. E., International Institute Aerospace Survey Earth Science, ITC Publishing, Enschede, The Netherlands, 106–110, 1987.; Bouraoui F. and Dillaha T. A.: ANSWERS-2000: Runoff and sediment transport model, J. Environ. Eng., 6, 493–502, 1996.; Braden, H.: Ein Energiehaushalts- und Verdunstungsmodell für Wasser- und Stoffhaushaltsuntersuchungen landwirtschaftlich genutzer Einzugsgebiete, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Bodenkundlichen Gesellschaft, 42, 294–299, 1985.; Christiaens, K. and Feyen, J.: Analysis of uncertainties associated with different methods to determine soil hydraulic properties and their propagation in the distributed hydrological MIKE SHE model, J. Hydrol., 246, 63–81, 2001.; Coppola, A., Basile, A., Comegna, A., and Lamaddalena, N.: Monte Carlo analysis of field water flow comparing uni and bimodal effective hydraulic parameters for structured soil, J. Contam. Hydrol., 104(1–4), 153–165, 2009.; Green, W. H. and Ampt, G.: Studies of soil physics. Part I. The flow of air and water through soils, J. Agr. Sci, 4, 1–24, 1911.; Allen, R., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: FAO, Irrigation and drainage Paper 56, Crop evapotranspiration, Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, 1998.; Belmans, C., Wesseling, J. C., and Feddes, R. A.: Simulation of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE, J. Hydrol., 63, 271–286, 1983.; Borgarello, M., Catenacci, G., Cavicchioli, C., and Parini, S.: Indagini sulla deposizione secca, Rapporto CISE-SAA-93-042, CISE, Milano, 1993.; Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Clapp, R. B., and Ginn, T. R.: A statistical exploration of the relationship of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils, Water Resour. Res., 20, 682–690, 1984.; Cresswell, H. P. and Paydar, Z.: Functional evaluation of methods for predicting the soil water characteristic, J. Hydrol., 227, 160–172, 2000.; D'Urso, G. and Basile, A.: Physico-empirical approach for mapping soil hydraulic behaviour, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1, 915–923, 1997.; Eitzinger, J., Trnka, M., Hosch, J., Alud, Z., and Dubrovsky, M.: Comparison of CERES, WOFOST and SWAP models in simulating soil water content during growing season under different soil conditions, Ecol. Model., 171, 223–246, 2004.; ERSAL (Ente Regionale Sviluppo Agricolo Lombardo), Progetto carta pedologica – I suoli della pianura pavese centrale, Regione Lombardia, 2001.; Facchi, A., Ortuani, B., Maggi, D., and Gandolfi, C.: Coupled SVAT-groundwater model for water resources simulation in irrigated alluvial plains, Environ. Modell. Softw., 19(11), 1053–1063, 2004.; Flanagan, D. C. and Livingston, S. J.: WEPP User Summary, NSERL Report No. 11., National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, 131 pp., 1995.; Freeze, R. A. and Cherry, J. A.: Groundwater, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 604 pp., 1979.; Gandolfi, C., Facchi, A., and Maggi, D.: Comparison of 1D models of water flow in unsaturated soils, Environ. Modell. Softw., 21, 1759–1764, 2006.; Gerosa, G., Cieslik, S., and Ballarin-Denti, A.: Micrometeorological determination of time integrated stomatal ozone fluxes over wheat: a case study in Northern Italy, Atm. Environm., 37(6), 777–788(C), 2003.; Goudriaan, J.: Crop meteorology: a simulation study, Simulation monographs


Click To View

Additional Books

  • Groundwater-surface Water Interactions, ... (by )
  • Water Consumption from Hydropower Plants... (by )
  • Corrigendum to Thermal Damping and Retar... (by )
  • Modelling Field Scale Water Partitioning... (by )
  • Shallow Groundwater Effect on Land Surfa... (by )
  • A Daily Salt Balance Model for Represent... (by )
  • Subsurface Lateral Flow from Hillslope a... (by )
  • Extreme Runoff Response to Short-duratio... (by )
  • Rivers We Can'T Bring Ourselves to Clean... (by )
  • Use of Remote Sensing for Hydrological P... (by )
  • A Global Water Scarcity Assessment Under... (by )
  • Possibilistic Uncertainty Analysis of a ... (by )
Scroll Left
Scroll Right


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.